Home: Difference between revisions

From WikiRetracted
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:


* [https://wikiletters.net Wiki-Letters]
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
* [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments]
 
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted]
* [https://wikiletters.net Wiki-Letters (Letters of caveats about papers)]
* [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum]
* [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments (Peer-reviewed Comments about papers]
* [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review]
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted (Papers that cited retractions)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science]
* [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum (Minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum/Corrigendum/Improper-Citation)]
* [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia]
* [https://wikiretracted.org WikiRetracted (Papers retracted from the scientific system)]
* [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData]
* [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review SR (a dynamical-method suggested for SR)]
* [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science (A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity]
* [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia (A bridge between Wikidata and Science)]
* [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData (Hosting scientific information under the Wiki-ecosystem)]
* [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite (Processing Citations that strengthen Wikipedia articles)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity (A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem)]
 
Additional very important systems supporting better science
 
* [https://retractionwatch.com RetractionWatch (news about retractions)]
* [https://pubpeer.com PubPeer (notes)]


== WikiRetracted (About) ==
== WikiRetracted (About) ==

Revision as of 16:10, 18 July 2022

WikiLetters.org

WikiLetters.org is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

WikiLetters.org is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

Additional very important systems supporting better science

WikiRetracted (About)

WikiRetracted (WR) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows platforms monitoring retractions to append any information about retracted papers in addition to researchers who wish to contribute to this wiki-ecosystem. This wiki-ecosystem ought to benefit other researchers aiming to read and maybe even use contents from a retracted article also known as retraction.

Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted information becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all.

Furthermore, WikiRetracted gives you the opportunity to provide a brief discussion about the the key-reasons for a retraction(e.g. a brief summary). Although WL strongly invites you to check RetractionWatch to see if such discussion is not yet available in order to avoid unnecessary repetitions. The freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.

WikiRetracted (Content contribution)

To contribute to WikiRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.

A similar written explanation for consideration:

, and a few tutorials for consideration:

You need to initially search for the full title of an article " (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WikiRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:

Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!

From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.

WikiComments (Structure)

It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the retracted article (or retraction). See examples below regarding a WikiErratum


Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.