Home: Difference between revisions

From WikiRetracted
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
* [https://wikiletters.net Wiki-Letters]
* [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments]
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted]
* [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum]
* [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science]
* [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia]
* [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData]
* [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity]
== WikiRetracted (About) ==
== WikiRetracted (About) ==


Line 22: Line 7:
Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted information becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all.  
Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted information becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all.  


Furthermore, WikiRetracted gives you the opportunity to provide a brief discussion about the the key-reasons for a retraction(e.g. a brief summary). Although WL strongly invites you to check RetractionWatch to see if such discussion is not yet available in order to avoid unnecessary repetitions. The freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.
Furthermore, WikiRetracted gives you the opportunity to provide a brief discussion about the the key-reasons for a retraction(e.g. a brief summary). Although WL strongly invites you to check [https://retractionwatch.com RetractionWatch] to see if such discussion is not yet available in order to avoid unnecessary repetitions. The freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.


</div>
</div>
Line 28: Line 13:
== WikiRetracted (Content contribution) ==
== WikiRetracted (Content contribution) ==


<div style="text-align:justify">To contribute to WikiRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.
<div style="text-align:justify">[[File:Template Retracted.png|alt=Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.|thumb|Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.]]To contribute to WikiRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.


A similar written explanation for consideration:
A similar written explanation for consideration:
Line 39: Line 24:
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_k_VbCDm2Y Youtube-tutorial]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_k_VbCDm2Y Youtube-tutorial]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CwiZIsaM7s Youtube-tutorial]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CwiZIsaM7s Youtube-tutorial]
You need to initially search for the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of an <span style="color:#ff0000">'''article '''</span> (e.g. '''doi.org/0123/456/789abcd''') inside WikiLetters to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:


You need to initially search for the full title of an <span style="color:#ff0000">'''article '''</span>" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WikiRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:
<span style="background:#c0c0c0">Create the page "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''Doi.org/0123/456/789abcd'''</span>" on this wiki!</span>


<span style="background:#c0c0c0">Create the page "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''TITLE-A'''</span>" on this wiki!</span>
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.


From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
'''Note:''' please just remember to search for a DOI including only the prefix '''"doi.org/"''' which will be automatically converted to '''"Doi.org/"''' for the page creation. Therefore, do not include any '''"http://"''' or '''"https://"''' as a prefix to a DOI.


</div>
</div>


== WikiComments (Structure) ==
== WikiRetracted (Structure) ==


<div style="text-align:justify">
<div style="text-align:justify">
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the retracted article (or retraction). See examples below regarding a WikiComment
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about a retracted article (or retraction). You may click on (Random page) at the left-menu to see a random page as an example. Alternatively, see the example below


* [https://wikicomments.org/index.php?title=The_confounded_self-efficacy_construct:_conceptual_analysis_and_recommendations_for_future_research WikiComment (01)]
* [https://wikiretracted.org/index.php?title=Doi.org/10.1002/cbf.2825 Example of a WikiRetracted]




Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.
Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.


</div>
== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
=== [https://wikiletters.net WL-Letters] ===
A database providing Letters of caveats about papers.
=== [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments] ===
A database providing peer-reviewed Comments about papers.
=== [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted] ===
A database displaying articles that cited retractions.
=== [https://wikiretracted.org WikiRetracted] ===
A database displaying articles retracted from the scientific system.
=== [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum] ===
A database displaying minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum / Corrigendum / Improper-Citation.
=== [https://wikilivingreviews.org WikiLivingReviews] ===
A database to support Living Reviews based upon a Wiki-ecosystem.
=== [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review SR] ===
A dynamic-method for Systematic Reviews.
=== [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science] ===
A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels.
=== [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData] ===
A system connecting information and data to humans and machines under the wiki-ecosystem.
=== [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia] ===
A bridge between Wikidata and Science.
=== [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite] ===
A system processing citations to strengthen Wikipedia articles.
=== [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity ] ===
A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem.
=== Additional relevant databases ===
* [https://retractionwatch.com RetractionWatch (news about retractions)]
* [https://pubpeer.com PubPeer (notes)]
== Comments ==
<div style="text-align:justify">
Here you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using this space below.
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 00:56, 18 August 2022

WikiRetracted (About)[edit | edit source]

WikiRetracted (WR) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows platforms monitoring retractions to append any information about retracted papers in addition to researchers who wish to contribute to this wiki-ecosystem. This wiki-ecosystem ought to benefit other researchers aiming to read and maybe even use contents from a retracted article also known as retraction.

Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted information becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all.

Furthermore, WikiRetracted gives you the opportunity to provide a brief discussion about the the key-reasons for a retraction(e.g. a brief summary). Although WL strongly invites you to check RetractionWatch to see if such discussion is not yet available in order to avoid unnecessary repetitions. The freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.

WikiRetracted (Content contribution)[edit | edit source]

Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
To contribute to WikiRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.

A similar written explanation for consideration:

, and a few tutorials for consideration:

You need to initially search for the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of an article (e.g. doi.org/0123/456/789abcd) inside WikiLetters to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:

Create the page "Doi.org/0123/456/789abcd" on this wiki!

From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.

Note: please just remember to search for a DOI including only the prefix "doi.org/" which will be automatically converted to "Doi.org/" for the page creation. Therefore, do not include any "http://" or "https://" as a prefix to a DOI.

WikiRetracted (Structure)[edit | edit source]

It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about a retracted article (or retraction). You may click on (Random page) at the left-menu to see a random page as an example. Alternatively, see the example below


Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.

WikiLetters.org[edit | edit source]

WikiLetters.org is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

WL-Letters[edit | edit source]

A database providing Letters of caveats about papers.

WikiComments[edit | edit source]

A database providing peer-reviewed Comments about papers.

WikiCitingRetracted[edit | edit source]

A database displaying articles that cited retractions.

WikiRetracted[edit | edit source]

A database displaying articles retracted from the scientific system.

WikiErratum[edit | edit source]

A database displaying minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum / Corrigendum / Improper-Citation.

WikiLivingReviews[edit | edit source]

A database to support Living Reviews based upon a Wiki-ecosystem.

WL-Systematic Review SR[edit | edit source]

A dynamic-method for Systematic Reviews.

WikiJournal of Science[edit | edit source]

A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels.

WikiData[edit | edit source]

A system connecting information and data to humans and machines under the wiki-ecosystem.

Scholia[edit | edit source]

A bridge between Wikidata and Science.

WikiCite[edit | edit source]

A system processing citations to strengthen Wikipedia articles.

Wikiversity [edit | edit source]

A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem.

Additional relevant databases[edit | edit source]

* RetractionWatch (news about retractions)
* PubPeer (notes)

Comments[edit | edit source]

Here you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using this space below.